4.8 Article

Backtracked and paused transcription initiation intermediate of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1605038113

关键词

transcription; pausing; backtracking; RNAP; RNA polymerase

资金

  1. CNRS
  2. University of Paris Diderot
  3. Programme Equipe Labellisees of the French Ligue Contre le Cancer
  4. National Institutes of Health [GM069709, GM095904]
  5. National Science Foundation [MCB-1244175]
  6. Direct For Biological Sciences [1244098] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  7. Div Of Molecular and Cellular Bioscience [1244098] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Initiation is a highly regulated, rate-limiting step in transcription. We used a series of approaches to examine the kinetics of RNA polymerase (RNAP) transcription initiation in greater detail. Quenched kinetics assays, in combination with gel-based assays, showed that RNAP exit kinetics from complexes stalled at later stages of initiation (e.g., from a 7-base transcript) were markedly slower than from earlier stages (e.g., from a 2-or 4-base transcript). In addition, the RNAP-GreA endonuclease accelerated transcription kinetics from otherwise delayed initiation states. Further examination with magnetic tweezers transcription experiments showed that RNAP adopted a long-lived backtracked state during initiation and that the paused-backtracked initiation intermediate was populated abundantly at physiologically relevant nucleoside triphosphate (NTP) concentrations. The paused intermediate population was further increased when the NTP concentration was decreased and/or when an imbalance in NTP concentration was introduced (situations that mimic stress). Our results confirm the existence of a previously hypothesized paused and backtracked RNAP initiation intermediate and suggest it is biologically relevant; furthermore, such intermediates could be exploited for therapeutic purposes and may reflect a conserved state among paused, initiating eukaryotic RNA polymerase II enzymes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据