4.8 Article

Active-site MMP-selective antibody inhibitors discovered from convex paratope synthetic libraries

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1609375114

关键词

inhibitory antibody; long CDR; synthetic library; convex paratope; MMP

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [1453645]
  2. NIH [R01 GM115672]
  3. California Breast Cancer Research Program Developmental and Exploratory Award [21IB-0104]
  4. Directorate For Engineering [1453645] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  5. Div Of Chem, Bioeng, Env, & Transp Sys [1453645] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Proteases are frequent pharmacological targets, and their inhibitors are valuable drugs in multiple pathologies. The catalytic mechanism and the active-site fold, however, are largely conserved among the protease classes, making the development of the selective inhibitors exceedingly challenging. In our departure from the conventional strategies, we reviewed the structure of known camelid inhibitory antibodies, which block enzyme activities via their unusually long, convex-shaped paratopes. We synthesized the human Fab antibody library (over 1.25 x 10(9) individual variants) that carried the extended, 23-to 27-residue, complementarity-determining region (CDR)-H3 segments. As a proof of principle, we used the catalytic domain of matrix metalloproteinase-14 (MMP-14), a promalignant protease and a drug target in cancer, as bait. In our screens, we identified 20 binders, of which 14 performed as potent and selective inhibitors of MMP-14 rather than as broad-specificity antagonists. Specifically, Fab 3A2 bound to MMP-14 in the vicinity of the active pocket with a high 4.8 nM affinity and was similarly efficient (9.7 nM) in inhibiting the protease cleavage activity. We suggest that the convex paratope antibody libraries described here could be readily generalized to facilitate the design of the antibody inhibitors to many additional enzymes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据