4.8 Article

Diverse high-torque bacterial flagellar motors assemble wider stator rings using a conserved protein scaffold

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1518952113

关键词

bacterial flagellar motors; electron cryo-tomography; macromolecular evolution; torque; Campylobacter

资金

  1. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/L023091/1]
  2. Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  3. National Institutes of Health [5R01AI065539, 5R21AI103643]
  4. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/L023091/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  5. BBSRC [BB/L023091/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Although it is known that diverse bacterial flagellar motors produce different torques, the mechanism underlying torque variation is unknown. To understand this difference better, we combined genetic analyses with electron cryo-tomography subtomogram averaging to determine in situ structures of flagellar motors that produce different torques, from Campylobacter and Vibrio species. For the first time, to our knowledge, our results unambiguously locate the torque-generating stator complexes and show that diverse high-torque motors use variants of an ancestrally related family of structures to scaffold incorporation of additional stator complexes at wider radii from the axial driveshaft than in the model enteric motor. We identify the protein components of these additional scaffold structures and elucidate their sequential assembly, demonstrating that they are required for stator-complex incorporation. These proteins are widespread, suggesting that different bacteria have tailored torques to specific environments by scaffolding alternative stator placement and number. Our results quantitatively account for different motor torques, complete the assignment of the locations of the major flagellar components, and provide crucial constraints for understanding mechanisms of torque generation and the evolution of multiprotein complexes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据