4.8 Article

Arabidopsis small nucleolar RNA monitors the efficient pre-rRNA processing during ribosome biogenesis

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1614852113

关键词

C/D box small nucleolar RNA; pre-rRNA processing; ribosome biogenesis

资金

  1. National Key Basic Research Program [2016YFA0500800]
  2. Major Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China [91540105]
  3. General Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China [31471155]
  4. National Basic Research Program (973 Program) [2012CB910900]
  5. State Key Laboratory of Protein and Plant Gene Research at Peking University
  6. Peking-Tsinghua Center for Life Sciences

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ribosome production in eukaryotes requires the complex and precise coordination of several hundred assembly factors, including many small nucleolar RNAs (snoRNAs). However, at present, the distinct role of key snoRNAs in ribosome biogenesis remains poorly understood in higher plants. Here we report that a previously uncharacterized C (RUGAUGA)/D (CUGA) type snoRNA, HIDDEN TREASURE 2 (HID2), acts as an important regulator of ribosome biogenesis through a snoRNA-rRNA interaction. Nucleolus-localized HID2 is actively expressed in Arabidopsis proliferative tissues, whereas defects in HID2 cause a series of developmental defects reminiscent of ribosomal protein mutants. HID2 associates with the precursor 45S rRNA and promotes the efficiency and accuracy of pre-rRNA processing. Intriguingly, disrupting HID2 in Arabidopsis appears to impair the integrity of 27SB, a key pre-rRNA intermediate that generates 25S and 5.8S rRNA and is known to be vital for the synthesis of the 60S large ribosomal subunit and also produces an imbalanced ribosome profile. Finally, we demonstrate that the antisense-box of HID2 is both functionally essential and highly conserved in eukaryotes. Overall, our study reveals the vital and possibly conserved role of a snoRNA in monitoring the efficiency of pre-rRNA processing during ribosome biogenesis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据