相关参考文献
注意：仅列出部分参考文献，下载原文获取全部文献信息。Competitive Science: Is Competition Ruining Science?
Ferric C. Fang et al.
INFECTION AND IMMUNITY (2015)
Measuring the effectiveness of scientific gatekeeping
Kyle Siler et al.
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (2015)
Testing for the fairness and predictive validity of research funding decisions: A multilevel multiple imputation for missing data approach using ex-ante and ex-post peer evaluation data from the Austrian science fund
Ruediger Mutz et al.
JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (2015)
Rescuing US biomedical research from its systemic flaws
Bruce Alberts et al.
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (2014)
By the Numbers: Track Record, Flawed Reviews, Journal Space, and the Fate of Talented Authors
Warren Thorngate et al.
ADVANCES IN SOCIAL SIMULATION (2014)
Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications
Ferric C. Fang et al.
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (2012)
Rewards and Creative Performance: A Meta-Analytic Test of Theoretically Derived Hypotheses
Kris Byron et al.
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN (2012)
Saint Matthew strikes again: An agent-based model of peer review and the scientific community structure
Flaminio Squazzoni et al.
JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS (2012)
Peer-review in a world with rational scientists: Toward selection of the average
S. Thurner et al.
EUROPEAN PHYSICAL JOURNAL B (2011)
A multilevel modelling approach to investigating the predictive validity of editorial decisions: do the editors of a high profile journal select manuscripts that are highly cited after publication?
Lutz Bornmann et al.
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES A-STATISTICS IN SOCIETY (2011)
Incentives and Problem Uncertainty in Innovation Contests: An Empirical Analysis
Kevin J. Boudreau et al.
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE (2011)
How social influence can undermine the wisdom of crowd effect
Jan Lorenz et al.
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (2011)
A validation of Amazon Mechanical Turk for the collection of acceptability judgments in linguistic theory
Jon Sprouse
BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS (2011)
Incentives and creativity: evidence from the academic life sciences
Pierre Azoulay et al.
RAND JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS (2011)
Sabotage in dynamic tournaments
Oliver Guertler et al.
JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL ECONOMICS (2010)
Journals step up plagiarism policing
Declan Butler
NATURE (2010)
The luck of the referee draw: the effect of exchanging reviews
Lutz Bornmann et al.
LEARNED PUBLISHING (2009)
Varieties of (Scientific) Creativity A Hierarchical Model of Domain-Specific Disposition, Development, and Achievement
Dean Keith Simonton
PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE (2009)
How many winners are good to have? On tournaments with sabotage
Christine Harbring et al.
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION (2008)
The perverse effects of competition on scientists' work and relationships
Melissa S. Anderson et al.
SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING ETHICS (2007)
Situating social influence processes: Dynamic, multidirectional flows of influence within social networks
Winter A. Mason et al.
PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW (2007)
The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge
Stefan Wuchty et al.
SCIENCE (2007)
Experimental study of inequality and unpredictability in an artificial cultural market
MJ Salganik et al.
SCIENCE (2006)
Self-determination theory and work motivation
M Gagné et al.
JOURNAL OF ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR (2005)
Dynamical evolutionary psychology: Individual decision rules and emergent social norms
DT Kenrick et al.
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW (2003)
The effects of monetary incentives on effort and task performance: theories, evidence, and a framework for research
SE Bonner et al.
ACCOUNTING ORGANIZATIONS AND SOCIETY (2002)
On the fragility of skilled performance: What governs choking under pressure?
SL Beilock et al.
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL (2001)
Reproducibility of peer review in clinical neuroscience - Is agreement between reviewers any greater than would be expected by chance alone?
PM Rothwell et al.
BRAIN (2000)
分享论文
