4.8 Article

Single-cell RNAseq reveals cell adhesion molecule profiles in electrophysiologically defined neurons

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1610155113

关键词

synapse; cell adhesion; single cell; RNAseq

资金

  1. National Institute on Drug Abuse Grant [K99 DA034029]
  2. Swiss National Science Foundation Grant [CRETP3_166815]
  3. National Institute of Mental Health Grants [R37 MH52804, K99 MH103531]
  4. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [CRETP3_166815] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In brain, signaling mediated by cell adhesion molecules defines the identity and functional properties of synapses. The specificity of presynaptic and postsynaptic interactions that is presumably mediated by cell adhesion molecules suggests that there exists a logic that could explain neuronal connectivity at the molecular level. Despite its importance, however, the nature of such logic is poorly understood, and even basic parameters, such as the number, identity, and single-cell expression profiles of candidate synaptic cell adhesion molecules, are not known. Here, we devised a comprehensive list of genes involved in cell adhesion, and used single-cell RNA sequencing (RNAseq) to analyze their expression in electrophysiologically defined interneurons and projection neurons. We compared the cell type-specific expression of these genes with that of genes involved in transmembrane ion conductances (i.e., channels), exocytosis, and rho/rac signaling, which regulates the actin cytoskeleton. Using these data, we identified two independent, developmentally regulated networks of interacting genes encoding molecules involved in cell adhesion, exocytosis, and signal transduction. Our approach provides a framework for a presumed cell adhesion and signaling code in neurons, enables correlating electrophysiological with molecular properties of neurons, and suggests avenues toward understanding synaptic specificity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据