4.8 Article

Structural characterization of the interaction of α-synuclein nascent chains with the ribosomal surface and trigger factor

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1519124113

关键词

NMR spectroscopy; ribosome; nascent chain; alpha-synuclein; cotranslational folding

资金

  1. Wellcome Trust [094425/Z/10/Z, 097806/Z/11/Z]
  2. Alpha-1 Foundation
  3. Motor Neurone Disease Association
  4. Biotechnology and Biochemical Sciences Research Council [BBG0156511]
  5. MRC [MC_U117533887] Funding Source: UKRI
  6. Wellcome Trust [097806/Z/11/Z] Funding Source: Wellcome Trust
  7. Medical Research Council [MC_U117533887] Funding Source: researchfish
  8. The Francis Crick Institute [10029] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The ribosome is increasingly becoming recognized as a key hub for integrating quality control processes associated with protein biosynthesis and cotranslational folding (CTF). The molecular mechanisms by which these processes take place, however, remain largely unknown, in particular in the case of intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs). To address this question, we studied at a residue-specific level the structure and dynamics of ribosome-nascent chain complexes (RNCs) of alpha-synuclein (alpha Syn), an IDP associated with Parkinson's disease (PD). Using solution-state nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy and coarse-grained molecular dynamics (MD) simulations, we find that, although the nascent chain (NC) has a highly disordered conformation, its N-terminal region shows resonance broadening consistent with interactions involving specific regions of the ribosome surface. We also investigated the effects of the ribosome-associated molecular chaperone trigger factor (TF) on alpha Syn structure and dynamics using resonance broadening to define a footprint of the TF-RNC interactions. We have used these data to construct structural models that suggest specific ways by which emerging NCs can interact with the biosynthesis and quality control machinery.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据