4.2 Article

Performance comparison of ethanol and butanol production in a continuous and closed-circulating fermentation system with membrane bioreactor

期刊

PREPARATIVE BIOCHEMISTRY & BIOTECHNOLOGY
卷 47, 期 3, 页码 254-260

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/10826068.2016.1224242

关键词

CCCF: continuous and closed-circulating fermentation; Butanol fermentation; ethanol fermentation; intensity; performance comparison; pervaporation; stability

资金

  1. State Key Laboratory of Oil and Gas Reservoir Geology Exploitation (Southwest Petroleum University) [PLN1422]
  2. Scientific Research Starting Project of SWPU [2014QHZ017]
  3. Young Scholars Development Fund of SWPU [201331010040]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Since both ethanol and butanol fermentations are urgently developed processes with the biofuel-demand increasing, performance comparison of aerobic ethanol fermentation and anerobic butanol fermentation in a continuous and closed-circulating fermentation (CCCF) system was necessary to achieve their fermentation characteristics and further optimize the fermentation process. Fermentation and pervaporation parameters including the average cell concentration, glucose consumption rate, cumulated production concentration, product flux, and separation factor of ethanol fermentation were 11.45g/L, 3.70g/L/h, 655.83g/L, 378.5g/m(2)/h, and 4.83, respectively, the corresponding parameters of butanol fermentation were 2.19g/L, 0.61g/L/h, 28.03g/L, 58.56g/m(2)/h, and 10.62, respectively. Profiles of fermentation and pervaporation parameters indicated that the intensity and efficiency of ethanol fermentation was higher than butanol fermentation, but the stability of butanol fermentation was superior to ethanol fermentation. Although the two fermentation processes had different features, the performance indicated the application prospect of both ethanol and butanol production by the CCCF system.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据