4.7 Article

Balancing throughput and response time in online scientific Clouds via Ant Colony Optimization (SP2013/2013/00006)

期刊

ADVANCES IN ENGINEERING SOFTWARE
卷 84, 期 -, 页码 31-47

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.advengsoft.2015.01.005

关键词

Cloud Computing; Scientific problems; Job scheduling; Swarm intelligence; Ant Colony Optimization; Genetic Algorithms

资金

  1. ANPCyT [PAE-PICT 2007-02311, PAE-PICT 2007-02312]
  2. National University of Cuyo [06/B253]
  3. PRH-UNCuyo Project
  4. National Scientific and Technological Research Council (CONICET)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Cloud Computing paradigm focuses on the provisioning of reliable and scalable infrastructures (Clouds) delivering execution and storage services. The paradigm, with its promise of virtually infinite resources, seems to suit well in solving resource greedy scientific computing problems. The goal of this work is to study private Clouds to execute scientific experiments coming from multiple users, i.e., our work focuses on the Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS) model where custom Virtual Machines (VM) are launched in appropriate hosts available in a Cloud. Then, correctly scheduling Cloud hosts is very important and it is necessary to develop efficient scheduling strategies to appropriately allocate VMs to physical resources. The job scheduling problem is however NP-complete, and therefore many heuristics have been developed. In this work, we describe and evaluate a Cloud scheduler based on Ant Colony Optimization (ACO). The main performance metrics to study are the number of serviced users by the Cloud and the total number of created VMs in online (non-batch) scheduling scenarios. Besides, the number of intra-Cloud network messages sent are evaluated. Simulated experiments performed using CloudSim and job data from real scientific problems show that our scheduler succeeds in balancing the studied metrics compared to schedulers based on Random assignment and Genetic Algorithms. (C) 2015 Civil-Comp Ltd. and Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据