4.7 Article

Determination of breakage rate and breakage mode of roller compacted pharmaceutical materials

期刊

POWDER TECHNOLOGY
卷 298, 期 -, 页码 99-105

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.powtec.2016.04.033

关键词

Oscillating mill; Milling kinetic; Breakage mode; Fraction of fines

资金

  1. IPROCOM Marie Curie initial training network - People Programme (Marie Curie Actions) of the European Union's Seventh Framework Programme FP7/ under REA [316555]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Roller compaction is a common unit operation in the manufacture of oral solid dose pharmaceutical products. The roller compactor can produce intermediate ribbons of compacted material that exhibit a range of mechanical properties. Both the breakage rate and the breakage mode of these intermediates will have an effect on the final particle size distribution (PSD), and are therefore important parameters in determining the performance of the final product in pharmaceutical manufacturing. The breakage rates of roller compacted ribbons of two pharmaceutical excipients, microcrystalline cellulose (MCC) and mannitol, were determined with two different approaches, i.e. by analysing the milling mass throughput and the change in mass in the largest granule size class. The self-similar solution of the breakage population balance equation provided an insight into size dependencies of breakage rates and the prevailing breakage mode for specific process parameters. The breakage rate was found to be dependent on the impeller speed, milling mesh aperture size and ribbon porosity; but not on grinding media fill level. For MCC ribbons the milling kinetic profile changed with the mesh aperture size, suggesting dependence of the breakage mode on screen size. Our work shows clear correlation between the amount of fines produced during milling and the underlying breakage mode. For the materials studied, it is evident that mannitol ribbons tend more toward an attrition breakage mode than MCC ribbons of equal porosity when milling with the same process settings. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据