4.7 Article

Experimental investigation on micro- and nano-PMMA dust explosion venting at elevated static activation overpressures

期刊

POWDER TECHNOLOGY
卷 301, 期 -, 页码 713-722

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.powtec.2016.07.012

关键词

Dust explosion venting; Maximum reduced overpressure; Vented pressures; Vented jet flame configurations

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51406023]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2014M560213]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [DUT16QY05]
  4. State Key Laboratory of Explosion Science and Technology (Beijing Institute of Technology) [KFJJ16-01M]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The coupling relationships between vented pressures and flames of micro- and nano-PMMA particles at elevated static activation overpressures were examined using the standard 20-L spherical dust explosion venting apparatus to reveal the differences of venting processes at different particle scales. It was found that by increasing the venting diameter or decreasing the static activation pressure, the maximum reduced overpressure of micro-PMMA particles was reduced significantly compared with that of nano-PMMA particles. By increasing the venting diameter, the competition between the pressure venting and flame venting was gradually transformed. For 100-nm PMMA particles, the vented flame would experience the advanced under-expanded jet flame, moderate under-expanded jet flame, subsonic jet flame and constant pressure combustion, with the latter two modes appearing only with a larger venting diameter. However, the venting process of 30-pm PMMA particles only underwent the moderate under-expanded jet flame, constant pressure combustion appearing only with a larger venting diameter. The flame venting accomplished later or earlier than the pressure venting depended on the venting diameter significantly. The vented flame scale and radiation intensity of the 100-nm PMMA particles were much stronger at the same concentration. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据