4.7 Article

Pre-scald brushing for removal of solids and associated broiler carcass bacterial contamination

期刊

POULTRY SCIENCE
卷 95, 期 12, 页码 2979-2985

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.3382/ps/pew257

关键词

poultry; slaughterhouse; scalding; fecal contamination

资金

  1. MEYN Food Processing Technology B.V., The Netherlands

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of the study was to investigate the effect of brushing prior to scalding on reducing the E. coli and Enterobacteriaceae concentrations on carcasses. Three visits were arranged to a commercial slaughterhouse in which carcasses were cleaned in a separate line. Ten batches were sampled to compare the E. coli and Enterobacteriaceae concentrations on carcasses before and after a stand-alone brushing unit. Per batch, 8 carcasses before and 8 after brushing were sampled by the whole-carcass rinse method. Furthermore, the dry matter content and the pH were determined in these samples, as these parameters indirectly (dry matter) or directly (pH) influence the scalding lethality. Results revealed a small but statistically significant reduction (P < 0.001) in E. coli and Enterobacteriaceae concentrations on the brushed car-casses. The concentrations on whole carcasses were reduced on average by 0.3 log for both E. coli and Enterobacteriaceae. Rinse samples from treated carcasses had significantly less dry matter on average by 2.5 g (P < 0.001) and significantly higher pH by 0.08 units (P < 0.001). Although these differences are statistically significant, they might have rather low biological relevance; thus, further optimization of brushes is needed for more relevant results. This study confirms that brushing reduces bacterial concentrations on carcasses, which may be increased potentially by enlarging the brushed surface of the carcass. Further inline investigations are needed to observe the effect of brushing on bacterial concentrations in scalding water and on carcasses after scalding and at the end of processing.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据