4.7 Article

Stimulated auxin levels enhance plum fruit ripening, but limit shelf-life characteristics

期刊

POSTHARVEST BIOLOGY AND TECHNOLOGY
卷 112, 期 -, 页码 215-223

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2015.09.012

关键词

Auxin/ethylene interaction; Fruit firmness; Ripening; Shelf-life

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ripening is a highly coordinated, irreversible event involving a series of physiological and biochemical changes, leading to the development of a soft fruit. One of the limiting factors that influence the economic value of fruit is the relatively short ripening period and limited shelf-life. In climacteric fruit, ethylene is a key regulator of ripening; however, recent research has shown that auxin also plays an important role during the event. To understand the contributions of ethylene, auxin and their interaction in ripening, two plum cultivars with widely varying fruit ripening behaviors were compared. The early cultivar, EG, exhibited a brief ripening process in association with rapid decline in firmness. The late cultivar, V9, displayed slow ripening behavior accompanying by notable extension in fruit firmness, resulting in prolonged shelf-life along with preserved fruit quality traits. Auxin has been suggested to play an indirect role in promoting fruit ripening via stimulating the transcription of several ethylene components, resulting in ethylene-induced fruit ripening and softening. This study shows further that there is a direct involvement of auxin in advancing ripening events independent of ethylene action through stimulating the transcription of several genes that encode cell-wall metabolism-related proteins critical for determining the fruit softening rate and potential shelf-life. These results support the hypothesis that the autonomous role played by auxin is as important as that of ethylene in determining not only fruit ripening behavior, but also in mediating other fruit quality traits including shelf-life. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据