4.5 Article

Novel polyurethane-based thermosensitive hydrogels as drug release and tissue engineering platforms: design and in vitro characterization

期刊

POLYMER INTERNATIONAL
卷 65, 期 7, 页码 756-769

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pi.5080

关键词

polyurethane hydrogels; poloxamer; thermosensitive hydrogels; tissue engineering; drug release; bioprinting

资金

  1. MIUR (Italian Ministry of Education University and Research) [RBFR10L0GK]
  2. Compagnia San Paolo

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Poloxamer P407 (P407) is a Food and Drug Administration approved triblock copolymer; its hydrogels show fast dissolution in aqueous environment and weak mechanical strength, limiting their in vivo application. In this work, an amphiphilic poly(ether urethane) (NHP407) was synthesized from P407, an aliphatic diisocyanate (1,6-hexanediisocyanate) and an amino acid derived diol (N-Boc serinol). NHP407 solutions in water-based media were able to form biocompatible injectable thermosensitive hydrogels with a lower critical gelation temperature behavior, having lower critical gelation concentration (6% w/v versus 18% w/v), superior gel strength (G at 37 degrees C about 40000Pa versus 10000Pa), faster gelation kinetics (<5min versus 15-30min) and higher stability in physiological conditions (28days versus 5 days) compared to P407 hydrogels. Gel strength and PBS absorption at 37 degrees C increased whereas dissolution rate (in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) at 37 degrees C) and permeability to nutrients (studied using fluorescein isothiocyanate-dextran model molecule) decreased as a function of NHP407 hydrogel concentration from 10% to 20% w/v. By varying the concentration, NHP407 hydrogels were thus prepared with different properties which could suit specific applications, such as in situ drug/cell delivery or bioprinting of scaffolds. Moreover, deprotected amino groups in NHP407 could be exploited for the grafting of bioactive molecules obtaining biomimetic hydrogels. (c) 2016 Society of Chemical Industry

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据