4.7 Article

Transparent blown films from poly(lactide) and poly(ethylene-co-vinyl acetate) compounds: Structure and property

期刊

POLYMER DEGRADATION AND STABILITY
卷 129, 期 -, 页码 328-337

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2016.05.010

关键词

Poly(lactide); Blown film; Anisotropic property; Notch sensitivity; Morphology

资金

  1. LANXESS Chemical (China) Co., Ltd.
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51303067, 51573074]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK20130147]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [JUSRP51624A]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The application range of poly(lactide), PLA, films is limited due to the brittleness and notch-sensitivity. In this work, thin films with balanced properties were fabricated by melt blowing of PLA and poly(ethylene-co-vinyl acetate) (EVA) blends. The film thickness is dependent on the taken-up speed and reached to around 10 mu m at the taken-up speed over 14 m/min. The presence of EVA not only significantly enhanced the tensile toughness and notch-resistance of the PLA films but also retained high transmittance. The films exhibited anisotropic mechanical performances which were correlated to the micro-morphology differences between the take-up direction (DD) and the transversal direction (TD) as characterized by atomic force microscope. In addition, the EVA with 80 wt% VA units showed better overall modification effect on the PLA films than the EVA with 60 wt% VA units. Superior mechanical properties of PLA/EVA (80/20) blends such as tensile strength of 50-60 MPa, elongation at break up to 230% and tear strength of 85 kN/m were achieved in the DD direction. Meanwhile, balanced properties were also achieved in TD direction. Moreover, a transmittance of around 90% was obtained for the PLA/EVA films which are comparable to neat PLA films. A high enough VA unit content is crucial for superior mechanical properties and high transparency. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据