4.7 Article

Enhancing the photovoltaic properties of low bandgap terpolymers based on benzodithiophene and phenanthrophenazine by introducing different second acceptor units

期刊

POLYMER CHEMISTRY
卷 7, 期 9, 页码 1747-1755

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c5py01985k

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51573154, 91233112, 51273168, 51403178]
  2. Program for Innovative Research Cultivation Team in University of the Ministry of Education of China [1337304]
  3. Innovation Group in Hunan Natural Science Foundation [12JJ7002]
  4. Hunan Provincial Education Department [13A102]
  5. Natural Science Foundation of Hunan [14JJ4019, 2015JJ3113]
  6. Open Project for the National Key Laboratory of Luminescent Materials and Devices [2014-skllmd-10]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Two novel donor-acceptor (D-A) type random conjugated terpolymers PBDTT-PPzIID and PBDTT-PPzDPP were synthesized by copolymerizing electron-rich alkylthienyl benzodithiophene (BDTT) and two different electron-deficient units, in which phenanthrophenazine (PPz) was the first acceptor unit, and isoindigo (IID) or diketopyrrolopyrrole (DPP) with a strong electron-withdrawing ability was the second acceptor unit, respectively. Compared to their parent polymer PTTPPz-BDTT, a broadening of the band in the long wavelength region from 500 to 850 nm and a significant decrease in HOMO levels were observed for the random terpolymers. Ca and PFN-Br were used as interfacial layers to optimize the devices, respectively. Pleasingly, after replacing Ca/Al with PFN-Br/Al as the cathode, the performance of both polymer devices improved greatly. A maximum power conversion efficiency (PCE) of 5.91% was obtained with a V-oc of 0.73 V, a J(sc) of 11.75 mA cm(-2) and a FF of 68.8% in the PBDTT-PPzDPP/PC71BM-based device, while the PBDTT-PPzIID/PC71BM-based device achieved a PCE of 4.21%. To the best of our knowledge, this is one of the highest recorded FF values among PSCs based on previously reported phenazine copolymers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据