4.3 Article

Comparative Study of Toxicological Impinge of Glyphosate And Atrazine (Herbicide) on Stress Biomarkers; Blood Biochemical and Haematological Parameters of the Freshwater Common Carp (Cyprinus carpio)

期刊

POLISH JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
卷 25, 期 5, 页码 1995-2001

出版社

HARD
DOI: 10.15244/pjoes/62698

关键词

glyphosate; atrazine; total protein; glucose; white blood cells

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The purpose of the present study was to scrutinize the effect of glyphosate and atrazine (herbicide) on blood biochemical and hematological parameters of common carp, (Cyprinus carpio), including plasma glucose (RBS), cholesterol (CH), serum protein (SP), creatinine phosphates (CPK), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), WBC, hemoglobin (Hb), platelets (PT), lymphocytes (LP), monocytes (MT), esinophils (EN), and neutrophils (NT), and on behavioral aspects for (24, 48, 72, 96) hours under doses of (0.1, 0.07, 0.05, 0.02) and (0.2, 0.15, 0.1, 0.05)mlL-1 respectively of glyphosate and atrazine. For analysis of biochemical and hematological parameters, the protocol of biochemical analyzer set (Merck Micro Lab 300 biochemistry analyzer) and hematological analyzer (Mindray BC-2300 Hematology Analyzer) was followed in the laboratory. An upturn in RBS, CH, and WBC concentration was observed while SR LDH, LT, MT, and EP concentrations were decreased against both herbicides. CPK and Hb concentrations were increased against atrazine, while against glyphosate the concentrations were decreased. PT and NT showed momentous upturn in concentrations against glyphosate, while showing a decline against atrazine. Both herbicides affected the blood biochemical and hematological parameters of the selected fish. Behaviorally, changes were observed against both herbicides, including loss of equilibrium, increase in the frequency of opercular movements, fast swimming and jumping, losing balance, becoming exhausted and lethargic, vertical swimming, and bleeding at the base of the eyeballs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据