4.6 Article

Generation of Functional Beta-Like Cells from Human Exocrine Pancreas

期刊

PLOS ONE
卷 11, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0156204

关键词

-

资金

  1. Medical Research Council [MR/J015277/1]
  2. National Services Division of NHS Scotland
  3. Wellcome Trust / Scottish Translational Medicine and Therapeutics Initiative [85664]
  4. MRC [MR/J015377/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. Medical Research Council [MR/J015377/1] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Transcription factor mediated lineage reprogramming of human pancreatic exocrine tissue could conceivably provide an unlimited supply of islets for transplantation in the treatment of diabetes. Exocrine tissue can be efficiently reprogrammed to islet-like cells using a cocktail of transcription factors: Pdx1, Ngn3, MafA and Pax4 in combination with growth factors. We show here that overexpression of exogenous Pax4 in combination with suppression of the endogenous transcription factor ARX considerably enhances the production of functional insulin-secreting beta-like cells with concomitant suppression of alpha-cells. The efficiency was further increased by culture on laminin-coated plates in media containing low glucose concentrations. Immunocytochemistry revealed that reprogrammed cultures were composed of similar to 45% islet-like clusters comprising >80% monohormonal insulin(+) cells. The resultant beta-like cells expressed insulin protein levels at similar to 15-30% of that in adult human islets, efficiently processed proinsulin and packaged insulin into secretory granules, exhibited glucose responsive insulin secretion, and had an immediate and prolonged effect in normalising blood glucose levels upon transplantation into diabetic mice. We estimate that approximately 3 billion of these cells would have an immediate therapeutic effect following engraftment in type 1 diabetes patients and that one pancreas would provide sufficient tissue for numerous transplants.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据