4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

Design for Natural Breast Augmentation: The ICE Principle

期刊

PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY
卷 137, 期 6, 页码 1728-1737

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000002230

关键词

-

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: The authors' published studies have helped define breast beauty in outlining key parameters that contribute to breast attractiveness. The ICE principle puts design into practice. It is a simplified formula for inframammary fold incision planning as part of the process for determining implant selection and placement to reproduce the 45: 55 ratio previously described as fundamental to natural breast appearance. The formula is as follows: implant dimensions (I)-capacity of the breast (C) = excess tissue required (E). The aim of this study was to test the accuracy of the ICE principle for producing consistent natural beautiful results in breast augmentation. Methods: A prospective analysis of 50 consecutive women undergoing primary breast augmentation by means of an inframammary fold incision with anatomical or round implants was performed. The ICE principle was applied to all cases to determine implant selection, placement, and incision position. Changes in parameters between preoperative and postoperative digital clinical photographs were analyzed. Results: The mean upper pole-to-lower pole ratio changed from 52: 48 pre-operatively to 45: 55 post-operatively (p < 0.0001). Mean nipple angulation was also statistically significantly elevated from 11 degrees to 19 degrees skyward (p = 0.0005). Accuracy of incision placement in the fold was 99.7 percent on the right and 99.6 percent on the left, with a standard error of only 0.2 percent. There was a reduction in variability for all key parameters. Conclusion: The authors have shown using the simple ICE principle for surgical planning in breast augmentation that attractive natural breasts may be achieved consistently and with precision.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据