4.6 Article

Endothelial Cells from Capillary Malformations Are Enriched for Somatic GNAQ Mutations

期刊

PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY
卷 137, 期 1, 页码 77E-82E

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000001868

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. Howard Hughes Medical Institute Funding Source: Medline
  2. NHLBI NIH HHS [R01 HL127030] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIAMS NIH HHS [AR064231, AR048564, P01 AR048564, R01 AR064231] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: A somatic mutation in GNAQ (c.548G>A; p.R183Q), encoding G(q), has been found in syndromic and sporadic capillary malformation tissue. However, the specific cell type containing the mutation is unknown. The purpose of this study was to determine which cells in capillary malformations have the GNAQ mutation. Methods: Human capillary malformation tissue was obtained from 13 patients during a clinically indicated procedure. Droplet digital polymerase chain reaction, capable of detecting mutant allelic frequencies as low as 0.1 percent, was used to quantify the abundance of GNAQ mutant cells in capillary malformation tissue. Six specimens were fractionated by fluorescence-activated cell sorting into hematopoietic, endothelial, perivascular, and stromal cells. The frequency of GNAQ mutant cells in these populations was quantified by droplet digital polymerase chain reaction. Results: Eight capillary malformations contained GNAQ p.R183Q mutant cells, two lesions had novel GNAQ mutations (p.R183L and p.R183G), and three capillary malformations did not have a detectable GNAQ p.R183 mutation. Mutant allelic frequencies ranged from 2 to 11 percent. Following fluorescence-activated cell sorting, the GNAQ mutation was found in the endothelial but not the platelet-derived growth factor receptor--positive cell population; mutant allelic frequencies were 3 to 43 percent. Conclusion: Endothelial cells in capillary malformations are enriched for GNAQ mutations and are likely responsible for the pathophysiology underlying capillary malformation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据