4.7 Article

Aluminum induced metabolic responses in two tea cultivars

期刊

PLANT PHYSIOLOGY AND BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 101, 期 -, 页码 162-172

出版社

ELSEVIER FRANCE-EDITIONS SCIENTIFIQUES MEDICALES ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2016.02.001

关键词

Camellia sinensis (L.); Root growth; Aluminum sulfate; Metabolic profiles

资金

  1. Livelihood Project of Qingdao City [13-1-3-85-nsh]
  2. Breeding Project of Shandong Province [20121212-03, 2013LZ12-03, 20141212-03]
  3. Significant Application Project of Agriculture Technology Innovation in Shandong Province [681402]
  4. Science and Technology Development Project of Shandong [2014GNC110019]
  5. Technology System of Modern Agricultural Industry in Shandong Province [SDAIT-21]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Tea [Camellia sinensis (L.)], is an aluminum (Al3+) hyperaccumulator plant and grows well in acid soils. In the present study, roots of two tea cultivars, JHC and YS were treated with different concentrations of Al3+. After treatments, the root length, dry matter, root activity and chlorophyll content (SPAD value) of JHC had greater increase than that of YS. We also detected metabolic changes of two varieties using GC MS method. Comparison between two cultivars indicated that shikimic pathway was more enhanced in YS roots by Ala} with higher levels of catechine, quinic acid and shikimic acid. While, more active amino acid synthesis was found in JHC roots and JHC leaves remained the higher level contents of metabolites related to cysteine synthesis. The comparison also showed that a large amount of sugar alcohols were accumulated in roots of two varieties, whereas most of them were reduced in YS leaves. Other well-known ligands, such as phosphoric acid and malic acid were observed in two cultivars that showed significantly altered abundances under Al3+ treatments. The results indicated that Al3+ adaptation of two cultivars may be correlated with their differential metabolism of amino acids, sugars and shikimic acids. (C) 2016 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据