4.7 Article

Characterization of a small acyl-CoA-binding protein (ACBP) from Helianthus annuus L. and its binding affinities

期刊

PLANT PHYSIOLOGY AND BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 102, 期 -, 页码 141-150

出版社

ELSEVIER FRANCE-EDITIONS SCIENTIFIQUES MEDICALES ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2016.02.025

关键词

Acyl-CoA; Acyl-CoA binding protein; Phosphatidic acid; Phosphatidylcholine; Phospholipids; Sunflower

资金

  1. MINECO
  2. FEDER [AGL2011-23187]
  3. Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientificas/Research Grant Council of Hong Kong (CSIC/RGC) [2011HK0008, S-HK006/12]
  4. Wilson and Amelia Wong Endowment Fund

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Acyl-CoA-binding proteins (ACBPs) bind to acyl-CoA esters and promote their interaction with other proteins, lipids and cell structures. Small class I ACBPs have been identified in different plants, such as Arabidopsis thaliana (AtACBP6), Brassica napes (BnACBP) and Oryza sativa (OsACBP1, OsACBP2, OsACBP3), and they are capable of binding to different acyl-CoA esters and phospholipids. Here we characterize HaACBP6, a class I ACBP expressed in sunflower (Helianthus annuus) tissues, studying the specificity of its corresponding recombinant HaACBP6 protein towards various acyl-CoA esters and phospholipids in vitro, particularly using isothermal titration calorimetry and protein phospholipid binding assays. This protein binds with high affinity to de novo synthetized derivatives palmitoly-CoA, stearoyl-CoA and oleoyl-CoA (K-d 0.29, 0.14 and 0.15 mu M respectively), On the contrary, it showed lower affinity towards linoleoyl-CoA (K-d 5.6 mu M). Moreover, rHaACBP6 binds to different phosphatidylcholine species (dipalmitoyl-PC, dioleoyl-PC and dilinoleoyl-PC), yet it displays no affinity towards other phospholipids like lyso-PC, phosphatidic acid and lysophosphatidic acid derivatives. In the light of these results, the possible involvement of this protein in sunflower oil synthesis is considered. (C) 2016 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据