4.8 Article

Mechanical Failure of Fine Root Cortical Cells Initiates Plant Hydraulic Decline during Drought

期刊

PLANT PHYSIOLOGY
卷 172, 期 3, 页码 1669-1678

出版社

AMER SOC PLANT BIOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.1104/pp.16.00923

关键词

-

资金

  1. American Vineyard Foundation
  2. USDA-ARS CRIS funding [5306-21220-004-00]
  3. Katherine Esau Graduate fellowship program
  4. Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Science, of the U.S. Department of Energy [DE-AC02-05CH11231]
  5. ARS [ARS-0426234, 813574] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Root systems perform the crucial task of absorbing water from the soil to meet the demands of a transpiring canopy. Roots are thought to operate like electrical fuses, which break when carrying an excessive load under conditions of drought stress. Yet the exact site and sequence of this dysfunction in roots remain elusive. Using in vivo x-ray computed microtomography, we found that drought-induced mechanical failure (i. e. lacunae formation) in fine root cortical cells is the initial and primary driver of reduced fine root hydraulic conductivity (Lp(r)) under mild to moderate drought stress. Cortical lacunae started forming under mild drought stress (-0.6 MPa Psi stem), coincided with a dramatic reduction in Lp(r), and preceded root shrinkage or significant xylem embolism. Only under increased drought stress was embolism formation observed in the root xylem, and it appeared first in the fine roots (50% loss of hydraulic conductivity [P-50] reached at -1.8 MPa) and then in older, coarse roots (P-50 = 23.5 MPa). These results suggest that cortical cells in fine roots function like hydraulic fuses that decouple plants from drying soil, thus preserving the hydraulic integrity of the plant's vascular system under early stages of drought stress. Cortical lacunae formation led to permanent structural damage of the root cortex and nonrecoverable Lp(r), pointing to a role in fine root mortality and turnover under drought stress.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据