4.8 Article

Regulation of Vegetative Phase Change by SWI2/SNF2 Chromatin Remodeling ATPase BRAHMA

期刊

PLANT PHYSIOLOGY
卷 172, 期 4, 页码 2416-2428

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1104/pp.16.01588

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31271313, 31470063]
  2. Zhejiang Natural Science Foundation [LR13C060001]
  3. grant for Innovative Research Team of Zhejiang Province of China [2013TD05]
  4. Zhejiang Agriculture and Forestry University [2012FR025]
  5. 1000 Youth Talents Program in China [2034020065]
  6. Undergraduate Innovation Incubator Project from China [2015R412042]
  7. National Institutes of Health [NIH GM051893]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Plants progress from a juvenile vegetative phase of development to an adult vegetative phase of development before they enter the reproductive phase. miR156 has been shown to be the master regulator of the juvenile-to-adult transition in plants. However, the mechanism of how miR156 is transcriptionally regulated still remains elusive. In a forward genetic screen, we identified that a mutation in the SWI2/SNF2 chromatin remodeling ATPase BRAHMA (BRM) exhibited an accelerated vegetative phase change phenotype by reducing the expression of miR156, which in turn caused a corresponding increase in the levels of SQUAMOSA PROMOTER BINDING PROTEIN LIKE genes. BRM regulates miR156 expression by directly binding to the MIR156A promoter. Mutations in BRM not only increased occupancy of the 22 and + 1 nucleosomes proximal to the transcription start site at the MIR156A locus but also the levels of trimethylated histone H3 at Lys 27. The precocious phenotype of brm mutant was partially suppressed by a second mutation in SWINGER (SWN), but not by a mutation in CURLEY LEAF, both of which are key components of the Polycomb Group Repressive Complex 2 in plants. Our results indicate that BRM and SWN act antagonistically at the nucleosome level to fine-tune the temporal expression of miR156 to regulate vegetative phase change in Arabidopsis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据