4.7 Article

Wheat Resistance to Fusarium Head Blight is Associated With Changes in Photosynthetic Parameters

期刊

PLANT DISEASE
卷 100, 期 4, 页码 847-852

出版社

AMER PHYTOPATHOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1094/PDIS-04-14-0398-RE

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31271721, 31171557]
  2. Provincial Science and Technology Foundation for International Cooperation Project of Sichuan, China [2010HH0038]
  3. Specific Foundation of Agronomy [nyhyzx3-15, 201303016]
  4. Key Project of the Education Ministry of China [2012146]
  5. Ministry of Science and Technology, China [2011CB100403, 2013CB127701]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Fusarium head blight (FHB) is an important wheat disease worldwide; however, its effects on the physiological parameters in plants with different levels of FHB resistance remain unclear. Here, we evaluated the effects of Fusarium graminearum infection on yield and the photosynthesis associated parameters P-n, G(s), and C-i, of wheat flag leaves and determined the influence of FHB resistance. The FHB-resistant wheat genotype L699 and its susceptible sister line L661 were point- and spray-inoculated. Photosynthesis-associated parameters were subsequently measured using a modulated photosynthesis system, and FHB intensity was evaluated. Compared with L661, FHB caused more significant reductions in the net photosynthetic rate and stomatal conductance of flag leaves in L699. However, FHB caused a larger reduction in the 1000-grain weight and total grain weight per spike in L661 compared with L699. Independence sample t test showed that FHB resistance was significantly higher in L699 compared with L661. We concluded that under the conditions of the present study, FHB had a significantly greater effect on net photosynthesis in the resistant line compared with the susceptible line; however, it had a greater impact on yield components in the susceptible line. These results provide a new insight into the physiological cost of host resistance to FHB.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据