4.7 Article

Resistance to Crown and Root Rot Caused by Phytophthora capsici in a Tomato Advanced Backcross of Solanum habrochaites and Solanum lycopersicum

期刊

PLANT DISEASE
卷 100, 期 4, 页码 829-835

出版社

AMER PHYTOPATHOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1094/PDIS-08-15-0888-RE

关键词

-

资金

  1. United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Cooperative State Research, Education and Extension Service (CSREES) Specialty Crop Research Initiative [2008-51180-0488]
  2. USDA CSREES Special Grant Research [2008-34572-193]
  3. North Carolina State University Hatch Project [NC02418]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Phytophthora capsici causes devastating disease on many vegetable crops, including tomato and other solanaceous species. Solanum habrochaites accession LA407, a wild relative of cultivated tomato, has shown complete resistance to four P. capsici isolates from Michigan cucurbitaceous and solanaceous crops in a previous study. Greenhouse experiments were conducted to evaluate 62 lines of a tomato inbred backcross population between LA407 and the cultivated tomato 'Hunt 100' and Peto 95-43' for resistance to two highly virulent P. capsici isolates. Roots of 6-weekold seedlings were inoculated with each of two P. capsici isolates and maintained in the greenhouse. Plants were evaluated for wilting and plant death three times per week for 5 weeks. Significant differences were observed in disease response among the inbred tomato lines. Most lines evaluated were susceptible to P. capsici isolate 12889 but resistant to isolate OP97; 24 tomato lines were resistant to both isolates. Heritability of Phytophthora root rot resistance was high in this population. Polymorphic molecular markers located in genes related to resistance and defense responses were identified and added to a genetic map previously generated for the population. Resistant lines and polymorphic markers identified in this study are a valuable resource for development of tomato varieties resistant to P. capsici.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据