4.7 Article

Effective screen of CRISPR/Cas9-induced mutants in rice by single-strand conformation polymorphism

期刊

PLANT CELL REPORTS
卷 35, 期 7, 页码 1545-1554

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00299-016-1967-1

关键词

SSN; CRISPR/Cas9; SSCP; Rice; OsROC5; OsDEP1

资金

  1. National Science Foundation of China [31330017, 31271420, 31371682]
  2. national Transgenic Major Project [2014ZX0801003B-002]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [ZYGX2013J099]
  4. East Carolina University
  5. North Carolina Biotechnology Center [2016-CFG-8003]
  6. Syngenta

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A method based on DNA single-strand conformation polymorphism is demonstrated for effective genotyping of CRISPR/Cas9-induced mutants in rice. Clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)/CRISPR-associated 9 (Cas9) has been widely adopted for genome editing in many organisms. A large proportion of mutations generated by CRISPR/Cas9 are very small insertions and deletions (indels), presumably because Cas9 generates blunt-ended double-strand breaks which are subsequently repaired without extensive end-processing. CRISPR/Cas9 is highly effective for targeted mutagenesis in the important crop, rice. For example, homozygous mutant seedlings are commonly recovered from CRISPR/Cas9-treated calli. However, many current mutation detection methods are not very suitable for screening homozygous mutants that typically carry small indels. In this study, we tested a mutation detection method based on single-strand conformational polymorphism (SSCP). We found it can effectively detect small indels in pilot experiments. By applying the SSCP method for CRISRP-Cas9-mediated targeted mutagenesis in rice, we successfully identified multiple mutants of OsROC5 and OsDEP1. In conclusion, the SSCP analysis will be a useful genotyping method for rapid identification of CRISPR/Cas9-induced mutants, including the most desirable homozygous mutants. The method also has high potential for similar applications in other plant species.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据