4.7 Article

Thermogenic respiratory processes drive the exponential increase of volatile organic compound emissions in Macrozamia cycad cones

期刊

PLANT CELL AND ENVIRONMENT
卷 39, 期 7, 页码 1588-1600

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/pce.12730

关键词

index; Macrozamia cycads; MEP pathway; monoterpenes; respiration; thermogenesis; volatile emissions

资金

  1. Australian Research Council [DP1095482]
  2. Australian Research Council [DP1095482] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An important outcome of plant thermogenesis is increased emissions of volatiles that mediate pollinator behaviour. We investigated whether the large increase in emissions, mainly the monoterpene beta-myrcene (>90%), during daily thermogenic events of Macrozamia maeleayi and lucida cycad cones are due solely to the influence of high cone temperatures or are, instead, a result of increased respiratory rates during thermogenesis. We concurrently measured temperature, oxygen consumption and beta-myrcene emission profiles during thermogenesis of pollen cones tinder typical environmental temperatures and during experimental manipulations of cone temperatures and aerobic conditions, all in the dark. The exponential rise in beta-myrcene emissions never occurred without a prior, large increase in respiration, whereas an increase in cone temperature alone did not increase emissions. When respiration during thermogenesis was interrupted by anoxic conditions, beta-myrcene emissions decreased. The increased emission rates are not a result of increased cone temperature per se (through increased enzyme activity or volatilization of stored volatiles) but are dependent on biosynthetic pathways associated with increased respiration during thermogenesis that provide the carbon, energy (ATP) and reducing compounds (NADPH) required for beta-myrcene production through the methylerythritol phosphate (MEP) pathway. These endings establish the significant contribution of respiration to volatile production during thermogenesis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据