4.7 Article

Photosynthetic response to globally increasing CO2 of co-occurring temperate seagrass species

期刊

PLANT CELL AND ENVIRONMENT
卷 39, 期 6, 页码 1240-1250

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/pce.12658

关键词

bicarbonate utilization; increasing atmospheric CO2; internal aeration; net photosynthesis

资金

  1. Australian Research Council [LP100200429, LP130100155]
  2. Danish Council for Strategic Research (NOVAGRASS) [12-132701]
  3. Australian Research Council [LP100200429] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Photosynthesis of most seagrass species seems to be limited by present concentrations of dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC). Therefore, the ongoing increase in atmospheric CO2 could enhance seagrass photosynthesis and internal O-2 supply, and potentially change species competition through differential responses to increasing CO2 availability among species. We used short-term photosynthetic responses of nine seagrass species from the south-west of Australia to test species-specific responses to enhanced CO2 and changes in HCO3-. Net photosynthesis of all species except Zostera polychlamys were limited at pre-industrial compared to saturating CO2 levels at light saturation, suggesting that enhanced CO2 availability will enhance seagrass performance. Seven out of the nine species were efficient HCO3- users through acidification of diffusive boundary layers, production of extracellular carbonic anhydrase, or uptake and internal conversion of HCO3-. Species responded differently to near saturating CO2 implying that increasing atmospheric CO2 may change competition among seagrass species if co-occurring in mixed beds. Increasing CO2 availability also enhanced internal aeration in the one species assessed. We expect that future increases in atmospheric CO2 will have the strongest impact on seagrass recruits and sparsely vegetated beds, because densely vegetated seagrass beds are most often limited by light and not by inorganic carbon.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据