4.8 Article

The Metabolite Pathway between Bundle Sheath and Mesophyll: Quantification of Plasmodesmata in Leaves of C3 and C4 Monocots

期刊

PLANT CELL
卷 28, 期 6, 页码 1461-1471

出版社

AMER SOC PLANT BIOLOGISTS
DOI: 10.1105/tpc.16.00155

关键词

-

资金

  1. Australian Microscopy and Microanalysis Research Facility (AMMRF)
  2. CSIRO Microscopy Centre
  3. Lee Foundation (IRRI)
  4. Centre of Excellence for Translational Photosynthesis (ANU)
  5. ANU Centre for Advanced Microscopy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

C-4 photosynthesis is characterized by a CO2-concentrating mechanism between mesophyll (M) and bundle sheath (BS) cells of leaves. This generates high metabolic fluxes between these cells, through interconnecting plasmodesmata (PD). Quantification of these symplastic fluxes for modeling studies requires accurate quantification of PD, which has proven difficult using transmission electron microscopy. Our new quantitative technique combines scanning electron microscopy and 3D immunolocalization in intact leaf tissues to compare PD density on cell interfaces in leaves of C-3 (rice [Oryza sativa] and wheat [Triticum aestivum]) and C-4 (maize [Zea mays] and Setaria viridis) monocot species. Scanning electron microscopy quantification of PD density revealed that C-4 species had approximately twice the number of PD per pitfield area compared with their C-3 counterparts. 3D immunolocalization of callose at pitfields using confocal microscopy showed that pitfield area per M-BS interface area was 5 times greater in C-4 species. Thus, the two C-4 species had up to nine times more PD per M-BS interface area (S. viridis, 9.3 PD mu m(-2); maize, 7.5 PD mu m(-2); rice 1.0 PD mu m(-2); wheat, 2.6 PD mu m(-2)). Using these anatomical data and measured photosynthetic rates in these C-4 species, we have now calculated symplastic C-4 acid flux per PD across the M-BS interface. These quantitative data are essential for modeling studies and gene discovery strategies needed to introduce aspects of C-4 photosynthesis to C-3 crops.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据