4.7 Article

A comprehensive draft genome sequence for lupin (Lupinus angustifolius), an emerging health food: insights into plant-microbe interactions and legume evolution

期刊

PLANT BIOTECHNOLOGY JOURNAL
卷 15, 期 3, 页码 318-330

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/pbi.12615

关键词

Legume comparative genomics; synteny; whole-genome assembly; flowering time genes; polyploidy; Genistoids

资金

  1. Australian Government
  2. Grains Research and Development Corporation (GRDC)
  3. Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO)
  4. University of Western Australia (UWA)
  5. Direct For Biological Sciences
  6. Div Of Biological Infrastructure [1444806] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  7. ARS [813499, ARS-0425040] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Lupins are important grain legume crops that form a critical part of sustainable farming systems, reducing fertilizer use and providing disease breaks. It has a basal phylogenetic position relative to other crop and model legumes and a high speciation rate. Narrow-leafed lupin (NLL; Lupinus angustifolius L.) is gaining popularity as a health food, which is high in protein and dietary fibre but low in starch and gluten-free. We report the draft genome assembly (609 Mb) of NLL cultivar Tanjil, which has captured >98% of the gene content, sequences of additional lines and a dense genetic map. Lupins are unique among legumes and differ from most other land plants in that they do not form mycorrhizal associations. Remarkably, we find that NLL has lost all mycorrhiza-specific genes, but has retained genes commonly required for mycorrhization and nodulation. In addition, the genome also provided candidate genes for key disease resistance and domestication traits. We also find evidence of a whole-genome triplication at around 25 million years ago in the genistoid lineage leading to Lupinus. Our results will support detailed studies of legume evolution and accelerate lupin breeding programmes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据