4.7 Article

Early silicification of leaves and roots of seedlings of a panicoid grass grown under different conditions: anatomical relations and structural role

期刊

PLANT BIOLOGY
卷 18, 期 6, 页码 1025-1030

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/plb.12488

关键词

Amorphous silica; biomineralisations; Bothriochloa laguroides; first photosynthetic leaf; silicophytoliths; structural reinforcement

资金

  1. Agencia Nacional de Promocion Cientifica y Tecnologica [PICT 1583/13]
  2. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata [EXA 643/13, EXA 741/15]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Grasses accumulate high amounts of silica deposits in tissues of all their organs, especially at mature stage. However, when and under which conditions do grass seedlings begin to produce these silica deposits and their relation with anatomy and development is little known. Here we investigated the silicification process in the first leaves and roots of seedlings of Bothriochloa laguroides grown in different substrate and Si treatments. The distribution and content of silica deposits in the organs of the seedlings grown under different conditions were analyzed through staining techniques and SEM-EDAX analyses. Leaf silica deposits were accumulated 3-4 days after the first leaf emergence, also under low silica solution (0.17-0.2 mM). Their location was mainly restricted to short costal cells from basal sectors, and scarcely in trichomes and xylem at tips. Silica content in leaves increased with the age of the seedlings. Roots presented dome-shaped silica aggregates, between 4-12 mu m of diameter, located in the inner tangential wall of endodermal cells and similar to those produced at maturity. Silicification begins early in the first photosynthetic leaf, and silica distribution is opposite to that found in mature plants, mainly restricted to basal sectors, probably acting as a reinforcing element. The fast incorporation of solid amorphous silica in leaves and roots, may be useful for farm applications in species that are Si-fertilized.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据