4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Zinc accumulation and distribution over tissues in Noccaea Naerulescens in nature and in hydroponics: a comparison

期刊

PLANT AND SOIL
卷 411, 期 1-2, 页码 5-16

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11104-016-3116-6

关键词

Noccaea caerulescens; Zinc tissue localization; Hyperaccumulation; Tolerance; Histochemistry; Leaf tissues

资金

  1. Russian Foundation for Basic Research (RFBR) [15-04-02236]
  2. international scientific program GDRI LOCOMET (Transport, localization and complexation of metals in hyperaccumulating plants) - National Center for Scientific Research
  3. French Embassy Metchnikov scholarship - Campus France

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Zinc distribution at the tissue level is studied almost exclusively in lab-grown plants. It is essential to establish to what extent the patterns observed in lab-grown plants are corresponding with those in nature. To this end, we compared Zn localization in Noccaea caerulescens growing in its natural environment, a zinc/lead mine tailing, with that in hydroponically grown plants of the same origin. Zinc concentrations in plants and soil were determined by flame AAS and Zn localization in leaf tissues was studied using Zn indicators Zincon and Zinpyr-1. The mean Zn concentration in plants at the mine tailings was around 15,000 mg/kg DW, which corresponded well with the Zn concentration in the leaves of plants grown at 1600 mu M Zn in the nutrient solution. The Zn distribution patterns in leaves of plants sampled from the mine and plants grown in hydroponics were identical. Zn-dependent staining was the most intensive in water-storage epidermal cells, guard cells and vascular bundles, and less intensive in subsidiary and mesophyll cells. Zinc distribution in hydroponically grown plants is representative for plants in nature. Preferential Zn sequestration in leaves, particularly in water-storage epidermal cells, restricts metal accumulation in mesophyll and contributes to Zn hypertolerance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据