4.7 Article

Warming alters competition for organic and inorganic nitrogen between co-existing grassland plant species

期刊

PLANT AND SOIL
卷 406, 期 1-2, 页码 117-129

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11104-016-2856-7

关键词

Amino acid; Peptide; Nutrient; Coexistence; Niche differentiation

资金

  1. National Environment Research Council NERC [CEH_L_069_05_2013]
  2. Swiss National Science Foundation SNSF [145973]
  3. BBSRC [BB/I009000/2]
  4. BBSRC [BB/I009000/2] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/I009000/2] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Grass species may acquire different forms of nitrogen (N) to reduce competition for the same resources. Climate change influences the availability of soil N and is therefore likely to cause shifts in N forms acquired by plants, thereby affecting their competitive interactions. We investigated the effects of warming on the uptake of different N forms and competitive interactions of Festuca ovina and Anthoxanthum odoratum in a pot experiment. The plants were grown either in monocultures or mixture, and at ambient or elevated temperature (+10 A degrees C), and supplied with C-13 and N-15 isotopes to test for treatment effects on the relative uptake of ammonium, alanine or tri-alanine. Both grass species took up relatively more N supplied as ammonium than as alanine or tri-alanine when grown under ambient conditions in monoculture. In contrast, when grown in mixtures, F. ovina took up the three supplied N forms in equal amounts, whereas A. odoratum switched to tri-alanine as the main N form. Under warmed conditions, both species took up the N forms equally, irrespective of competition treatments. We have shown that grass species grown in mixture and under ambient conditions reduce competition by acquiring different N forms. Warming increased the availability of inorganic N in the soil and therefore deregulated the need for differential uptake of N forms.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据