4.7 Article

Leaf litter thickness, but not plant species, can affect root detection by ground penetrating radar

期刊

PLANT AND SOIL
卷 408, 期 1-2, 页码 271-283

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11104-016-2931-0

关键词

Coarse roots; Leaf litter; Nondestructive root detection; Phyllostachys pubescens; Root diameter

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT), Japan [22380090, 25252027]
  2. Program for Supporting Activities for Female Researchers
  3. MEXT's Special Coordination Fund for Promoting Science and Technology
  4. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [25252027, 22380090] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ground penetrating radar (GPR), a nondestructive tool that can detect coarse tree roots, has not yet become a mature technology for use in forests. In this study, we asked two questions concerning this technology: (i) Does the leaf litter layer influence root detection and major indices based on the time interval between zero crossings (T) and the amplitude area (A)? (ii) Can GPR images discriminate roots of different plant species? Roots buried in a sandy bed, which was covered with different thicknesses of leaf litter, were scanned using a 900 MHz GPR antenna. Roots of four plant species in the bed were also scanned. Leaf litter decreased root reflections without distorting the shape of the hyperbolas in the radar profile. A values decreased with increasing litter thickness, whereas T was independent of litter thickness. For all species combined, GPR indices were significantly correlated with root diameter. Leaf litter dramatically decreased root detection, but the influence of the litter could be ignored when the sum of T for all reflection waveforms (I T) pound is adopted to estimate root diameter. To use A values to detect roots, litter should be removed or equalized in thickness. Radar profiles could not reliably differentiate among roots belonging to plants of different species.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据