4.7 Article

Regulation and Levels of the Thylakoid K+/H+ Antiporter KEA3 Shape the Dynamic Response of Photosynthesis in Fluctuating Light

期刊

PLANT AND CELL PHYSIOLOGY
卷 57, 期 7, 页码 1557-1567

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/pcp/pcw085

关键词

Arabidopsis; KEA3; Non-photochemical quenching; PSII quantum efficiency; Thylakoid membrane

资金

  1. Carnegie Institution for Science
  2. Max Planck Society
  3. Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation RIPE project at the University of Illinois
  4. Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  5. Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation [GBMF3070]
  6. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [AR 808/1-1, AR 808/1-2]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Crop canopies create environments of highly fluctuating light intensities. In such environments, photoprotective mechanisms and their relaxation kinetics have been hypothesized to limit photosynthetic efficiency and therefore crop yield potential. Here, we show that overexpression of the Arabidopsis thylakoid K+/H+ antiporter KEA3 accelerates the relaxation of photoprotective energy-dependent quenching after transitions from high to low light in Arabidopsis and tobacco. This, in turn, enhances PSII quantum efficiency in both organisms, supporting that in wild-type plants, residual light energy quenching following a high to low light transition represents a limitation to photosynthetic efficiency in fluctuating light. This finding underscores the potential of accelerating quenching relaxation as a building block for improving photosynthetic efficiency in the field. Additionally, by overexpressing natural KEA3 variants with modification to the C-terminus, we show that KEA3 activity is regulated by a mechanism involving its lumen-localized C-terminus, which lowers KEA3 activity in high light. This regulatory mechanism fine-tunes the balance between photoprotective energy dissipation in high light and maximum quantum yield in low light, likely to be critical for efficient photosynthesis in fluctuating light conditions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据