4.2 Article

Immunoprofiling of glial tumours of the neurohypophysis suggests a common pituicytic origin of neoplastic cells

期刊

PITUITARY
卷 20, 期 2, 页码 211-217

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11102-016-0762-x

关键词

Neurohypophysis; Pituicytoma; Spindle cell oncocytoma; Granular cell tumour; TTF-1; Vimentin; S100-protein

资金

  1. Novartis Pharma GmbH (Nurnberg)
  2. Novo Nordisk Pharma GmbH (Mainz)
  3. Pfizer Pharma GmbH (Berlin)
  4. Ipsen Pharma GmbH (Berlin)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose To analyse the antigen expression profiles of 27 cases of pituicytoma, spindle cell oncocytoma, and granular cell tumour of the sellar region concerning a common pituicytic origin of neoplastic cells. Methods Material from 12 female and 15 male patients (13 granular cell tumours of the sellar region, 10 pituicytomas, four spindle cell oncocytomas) collected in the German Registry of Pituitary Tumours between 1993 and 2015 was re-evaluated according to the current WHO classification of tumours of the central nervous system and supplementary immunohistochemistry including S100-protein, CD56, CD68, thyroid transcription factor-1 (TTF-1), and Ki-67 was performed. Results S100-protein was detected in all 27 tumours and TTF-1 in all 16 tumours that were assessed. Vimentin was expressed in all 13 cases investigated whereas broad spectrum cytokeratin was not detected in any of 14 evaluated cases. GFAP was observed in nine out of 21 cases. 15 out of 17 investigated lesions showed some CD68 expression and five out of 14 cases were labelled with CD56 antibodies. Proliferative activity did not differ significantly between the three tumour subgroups although one primary and one recurrent pituicytoma showed exceptionally high Ki-67-proliferation indices of 15.3 and 12.7 %, respectively (means: granular cell tumour of the sellar region 2.0 %, pituicytoma 2.8 %, spindle cell oncocytoma 2.7 %). Conclusions The study confirms and expands earlier data and is in line with the notion that the three tumour types are variants of pituicytoma.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据