4.7 Article

Role of phytochemicals in the management of metabolic syndrome

期刊

PHYTOMEDICINE
卷 23, 期 11, 页码 1134-1144

出版社

ELSEVIER GMBH
DOI: 10.1016/j.phymed.2015.11.009

关键词

Metabolic syndrome; Hypertension; Dyslipidaemia; Nutraceuticals; Insulin resistance; Obesity

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: The World Health Organization (WHO) for some years has-been focusing on what is now commonly referred to as an epidemic of obesity and diabetes (diabesity): behind this outbreak, there are several risk factors grouped in what is called metabolic syndrome (MetS). The basis of this epidemic is either a diet too often characterized by excessive consumption of saturated and trans-esterified fatty acids, simple sugars and salt, either a sedentary lifestyle. Purpose: The aim of this review is to focus on the phytochemicals that have a more positive effect on the treatment and/or prevention of MetS. Chapters: Treatment strategies for MetS include pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic options, with varying degrees of success rate. The first is indicated for patients with high cardiovascular risk, while the second one is the most cost-effective preventive approach for subjects with borderline parameters and for patients intolerant to pharmacological therapy. MetS non-pharmacological treatments could involve the use of nutraceuticals, most of which has plant origins (phytochemicals), associated with lifestyle improvement. The chapter will discuss the available evidence on soluble fibres from psyllium and other sources, cinnamaldehyde, cinnamic acid and other cinnamon phytochemicals, berberine, corosolic acid from banaba, charantin from bitter gourd, catechins and flavonols from green tea and cocoa. Vegetable omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids, allfin from garlic, soy peptides, and curcumin from curcuma longa. Conclusion: Some nutraceuticals, when adequately dosed, should improve a number of the MetS components. (C) 2015 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据