4.7 Article

Reversal of diabetes-induced behavioral and neurochemical deficits by cinnamaldehyde

期刊

PHYTOMEDICINE
卷 23, 期 9, 页码 923-930

出版社

ELSEVIER GMBH
DOI: 10.1016/j.phymed.2016.04.008

关键词

Diabetes; Cognititon; Cinnamaldehyde; GABA; Glutamate; IL-6; TNF-alpha

资金

  1. Department of Pharmaceuticals, Govt of India
  2. University Grant Commission (UGC), New Delhi

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Chronic hyperglycemia during diabetes is associated with altered cognitive function. Cinnamaldehyde showed to have many pharmacological activities indicating anti-diabetic, cognitive enhancer, antiinflammatory etc. In the present study, we have investigated the effects of cinnamaldehyde (CA) on diabetes-induced cognitive deficits. Methods: Diabetes was induced in Sprague Dawley rats using high fat diet followed by streptozotocin (35 mg/kg, i.p.). High fat diet feeding was continued for 18 week after STZ administration. CA was administered daily during the last 3 weeks (week 16-18) at a doses of 10, 20 and 40 mg/kg (p.o.). Animals were subjected to behavioral tests during 18th week. Neurotransmitter levels (glutamate and GABA), acetylcholine esterase (AChE) activity and inflammatory markers (TNF-alpha and IL-6) were assessed in the hippocampus and cortex. Results: Vehicle-treated diabetic rats showed impaired behavior in open field, elevated plus maze and water maze test compared to age-matched control rats. Cinnamaldehyde showed significant reduction in blood glucose levels at dose of 20 and 40 mg/kg. Three weeks treatments of cinnamaldehyde showed significant amelioration of behavioral deficits in diabetic rats. Chronic treatment with cinnamaldehyde showed improvement in brain ChE activity, neurotransmitter levels and reduction in IL-6 and TNF-alpha levels. Conclusion: The present study demonstrates that treatment with cinnamaldehyde reverse neuroinflammation and changes in neurotransmitter levels, and consequently improves behavioral deficits in diabetic rats. (C) 2016 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据