4.7 Article

Truncations of xyloglucan xylosyltransferase 2 provide insights into the roles of the N- and C-terminus

期刊

PHYTOCHEMISTRY
卷 128, 期 -, 页码 12-19

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.phytochem.2016.03.016

关键词

Arabidopsis thalania; Truncated proteins; Xyloglucan xylosyltransferase activity; Xyloglucan

资金

  1. NSF-MCB grant [1121163]
  2. Div Of Molecular and Cellular Bioscience
  3. Direct For Biological Sciences [1121163] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Xyloglucan is the most abundant hemicellulose in the primary cell wall of dicotyledonous plants. In Arabidopsis, three xyloglucan xylosyltransferases, XXT1, XXT2, and XXT5, participate in xylosylation of the xyloglucan backbone. Despite the importance of these enzymes, there is a lack of information on their structure and the critical residues required for substrate binding and transferase activity. In this study, the roles of different domains of XX2 in protein expression and catalytic activity were investigated by constructing a series of N- and C-terminal truncations. XXT2 with an N-terminal truncation of 31 amino acids after the predicted transmembrane domain showed the highest protein expression, but truncations of more than 31 residues decreased protein expression and catalytic activity. XXT2 constructs with C-terminal truncations showed increased protein expression but decreased activity, particularly for truncations of 44 or more amino acids. Site-directed mutagenesis was also used to investigate six positively charged residues near the C-terminus and found that four of the mutants showed decreased enzymatic activity. We conclude that the N- and C-termini of XXT2 have important roles in protein folding and enzymatic activity: the stem region (particularly the N-terminus of the catalytic domain) is critical for protein folding and the C-terminus is essential for enzymatic activity but not for protein folding. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据