4.5 Article

Expression of molecular markers associated to defense signaling pathways and strigolactone biosynthesis during the early interaction tomato-Phelipanche ramosa

期刊

PHYSIOLOGICAL AND MOLECULAR PLANT PATHOLOGY
卷 94, 期 -, 页码 100-107

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.pmpp.2016.05.007

关键词

Defense responses; Molecular markers; Phytohormones; Root parasitic plants; Strigolactones

资金

  1. Spanish National R&D Plan of the Ministry of Science and Innovation (MICINN) [AGL2012-39923]
  2. MINCIN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Root parasitic plants of the family Orobanchaceae cause severe damage to important agricultural crops worldwide. These parasitic weeds are difficult to control since most of their lifecycle occurs below-ground. This hinders the diagnosis of infection and normally when irreversible damage has been caused to the crop. Therefore, new and more effective control strategies against these parasitic weeds should be focused on the initial stages of the interaction. Using tomato-Phelipanche ramosa as model system, we have explored the host response during the initial phase of parasitic infection by monitoring the expression of marker genes of different defense-related hormonal pathways. Two different colonization stages were selected and analyzed by quantitative real-time PCR. The data suggest that the three principal defense regulating hormonal pathways - salicylic acid (SA), jasmonic acid (JA) and abscisic acid (ABA) - are induced after infection, being therefore, likely involved in the defense response against these root parasites. In addition, an induction of the strigolactone (SL) biosynthesis genes SlD27 and SlCCD8 was observed. Our results suggest a complex regulation of plant defenses during the early stages of plant-parasite interaction involving the classical defense hormones, and suggest an additional role of the parasite germination stimulants SLs at this post-attachment stage. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据