4.8 Article

Enhanced Performance of Flower-like Li4Ti5O12 Motifs as Anode Materials for High-Rate Lithium-Ion Batteries

期刊

CHEMSUSCHEM
卷 8, 期 19, 页码 3304-3313

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/cssc.201500639

关键词

batteries; energy conversion; flower-like structures; hydrothermal synthesis; lithium

资金

  1. Center for Mesoscale Transport Properties, an Energy Frontier Research Center - U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Basic Energy Sciences [DE-SC0012673]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Flower-like motifs of Li4Ti5O12 were synthesized by using a facile and large-scale hydrothermal process involving unique Ti foil precursors followed by a short, relatively low-temperature calcination in air. Moreover, a detailed time-dependent growth mechanism and a reasonable reaction scheme were proposed to clearly illustrate and highlight the structural evolution and subsequent formation of this material. Specifically, the resulting flower-like Li4Ti5O12 microspheres consisting of thin nanosheets provide for an enhanced surface area and a reduced lithium-ion diffusion distance. The high surface areas of the exposed roughened, thin petal-like component nanosheets are beneficial for the interaction of the electrolyte with Li4Ti5O12, which thereby ultimately provides for improved high-rate performance and favorable charge/discharge dynamics. Electrochemical studies of the as-prepared nanostructured Li4Ti5O12 clearly revealed their promising potential as an enhanced anode material for lithium-ion batteries, as they present both excellent rate capabilities (delivering 148, 141, 137, 123, and 60mAhg(-1) under discharge rates of 0.2, 10, 20, 50, and 100C, at cycles of 50, 55, 60, 65, and 70, respectively) and stable cycling performance (exhibiting a capacity retention of approximate to 97% from cycles10-100, under a discharge rate of 0.2C, and an impressive capacity retention of approximate to 87% by using a more rigorous discharge rate of 20C from cycles101-300).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据