4.4 Article

Improving the location of induced earthquakes associated with an underground gas storage in the Gulf of Valencia (Spain)

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.pepi.2016.03.006

关键词

Induced seismicity; Nonlinear earthquake location; Cross-correlation; 3-D velocity model; Earthquake multiplets

资金

  1. project MISTERIOS [CGL2013-48601-C2-1-R]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

On September 2013, increased seismic activity was recorded near the CASTOR offshore underground gas storage (UGS), in the Gulf of Valencia (Spain). According to the reports by the Spanish Instituto Geografico Nacional (IGN), more than 550 events occurred during two months, the strongest having a magnitude of M-W = 4.2 which took place two weeks after the gas injection stopped. The low magnitude of the events (with only 17 earthquakes having m(bLg) greater than 3), the lack of nearby stations, and the inhomogeneous station distribution made the location problem a great challenge. Here we present improved locations for a subset of 161 well recorded events from the earthquake sequence using a probabilistic nonlinear earthquake location method. A new 3-D shear-wave velocity model is also estimated in this work from surface-wave ambient noise tomography. To further improve the locations, waveform cross-correlations are computed at each station for every event pair and new locations are obtained from an inverted set of adjusted travel time picks. The resulting hypocentral solutions show a tighter clustering with respect to the initial locations and they are distributed in a NW SE direction. Most of the earthquakes are located near the injection well at depths of about 6 km. Our results indicate that the observed seismicity is closely associated with the injection activities at the CASTOR underground gas storage and may have resulted from the reactivation of pre-existing unmapped faults, located a few kilometers below the reservoir. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据