4.6 Article

Iterative feature refinement for accurate undersampled MR image reconstruction

期刊

PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY
卷 61, 期 9, 页码 3291-3316

出版社

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/61/9/3291

关键词

magnetic resonance imaging; undersampled image reconstruction; iterative feature refinement

资金

  1. China NSFC [61471350, 11301508, 61401449]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong [2015A020214019, 2015A030310314, 2015A030313740]
  3. Basic Research Program of Shenzhen [JCYJ20140610152828678, JCYJ20140610151856736, JCYJ20150630114942318]
  4. SIAT Innovation Program for Excellent Young Researchers [201403, 201313]
  5. Direct For Computer & Info Scie & Enginr
  6. Division of Computing and Communication Foundations [1632599] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  7. Directorate For Engineering
  8. Div Of Chem, Bioeng, Env, & Transp Sys [1265612] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Accelerating MR scan is of great significance for clinical, research and advanced applications, and one main effort to achieve this is the utilization of compressed sensing (CS) theory. Nevertheless, the existing CSMRI approaches still have limitations such as fine structure loss or high computational complexity. This paper proposes a novel iterative feature refinement (IFR) module for accurate MR image reconstruction from undersampled K-space data. Integrating IFR with CSMRI which is equipped with fixed transforms, we develop an IFR-CS method to restore meaningful structures and details that are originally discarded without introducing too much additional complexity. Specifically, the proposed IFR-CS is realized with three iterative steps, namely sparsity-promoting denoising, feature refinement and Tikhonov regularization. Experimental results on both simulated and in vivo MR datasets have shown that the proposed module has a strong capability to capture image details, and that IFR-CS is comparable and even superior to other state-of-the-art reconstruction approaches.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据