4.6 Article

Validity, Reliability, and Ability to Identify Fall Status of the Berg Balance Scale, BESTest, Mini-BESTest, and Brief-BESTest in Patients With COPD

期刊

PHYSICAL THERAPY
卷 96, 期 11, 页码 1807-1815

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.2522/ptj.20150391

关键词

-

资金

  1. O Fundo Europeu de Desenvolvimento Regional (FEDER)
  2. Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia (FCT) [UID/BIM/04501/2013]
  3. National Funds through Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia [UID/CEC/00127/2013, Incentivo/EEI/UI0127/2014]
  4. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [UID/CEC/00127/2013, Incentivo/EEI/UI0127/2013, Incentivo/EEI/UI0127/2014] Funding Source: FCT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. The Berg Balance Scale (BBS), Balance Evaluation Systems Test (BESTest), Mini-BESTest, and Brief-BESTest are useful in the assessment of balance. Their psychometric properties, however, have not been tested in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Objective. This study aimed to compare the validity, reliability, and ability to identify fall status of the BBS, BESTest, Mini-BESTest, and the Brief-BESTest in patients with COPD. Design. A cross-sectional study was conducted. Methods. Forty-six patients (24 men, 22 women; mean age=75.9 years, SD=7.1) were included. Participants were asked to report their falls during the previous 12 months and to fill in the Activity-specific Balance Confidence (ABC) Scale. The BBS and the BESTest were administered. Mini-BESTest and Brief-BESTest scores were computed based on the participants' BESTest performance. Validity was assessed by correlating balance tests with each other and with the ABC Scale. Interrater reliability (2 raters), intrarater reliability (48-72 hours), and minimal detectable changes (MDCs) were established. Receiver operating characteristics assessed the ability of each balance test to differentiate between participants with and without a history of falls. Results. Balance test scores were significantly correlated with each other (Spearman correlation rho=.73-.90) and with the ABC Scale (rho=.53-.75). Balance tests presented high interrater reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC]=.85-.97) and intrarater reliability (ICC=.52-.88) and acceptable MDCs (MDC=3.3-6.3 points). Although all balance tests were able to identify fall status (area under the curve=0.74-0.84), the BBS (sensitivity=73%, specificity=77%) and the Brief-BESTest (sensitivity=81%, specificity=73%) had the higher ability to identify fall status. Limitations. Findings are generalizable mainly to older patients with moderate COPD. Conclusions. The 4 balance tests are valid, reliable, and valuable in identifying fall status in patients with COPD. The Brief-BESTest presented slightly higher interrater reliability and ability to differentiate participants' fall status.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据