4.8 Article

Non-Negligible Diffusio-Osmosis Inside an Ion Concentration Polarization Layer

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS
卷 116, 期 25, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.254501

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea [CISS-2011-0031870, 2012-0009563, 2014-048162, 2016R1A1A1A05005032]
  2. Korean Health Technology RND project [HI13C1468, HI14C0559]
  3. BK21+ program of Creative Research Engineer Development IT, Seoul National University
  4. Korea Health Promotion Institute [HI13C1468070015] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)
  5. National Research Foundation of Korea [2012-0009563, 2016R1A1A1A05005032, 2009-0094042] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The first experimental and theoretical evidence was provided for the non-negligible role of a diffusio-osmosis in the ion concentration polarization (ICP) layer, which had been reported to be in a high Peclet number regime. Under the assumption that the hydrated shells of cations were stripped out with the amplified electric field inside the ICP layer, its concentration profile possessed a steep concentration gradient at the stripped location. Since the concentration gradient drove a strong diffusio-osmosis, the combination of electro-osmotic and diffusio-osmotic slip velocity had a form of an anomalous nonmonotonic function with both a single-and multiple-cationic solution. A direct measurement of electrolytic concentrations around the layer quantitatively validated our new investigations. This non-negligible diffusio-osmotic contribution in a micro-and nanofluidic platform or porous medium would be essential for clarifying the fundamental insight of nanoscale electrokinetics as well as guiding the engineering of ICP-based electrochemical systems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据