4.8 Article

Free Nano-Object Ramsey Interferometry for Large Quantum Superpositions

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS
卷 117, 期 14, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.143003

关键词

-

资金

  1. EPSRC [EP/J014664/1]
  2. EPSRC as part of UK Hub in Networked Quantum Information Technologies (NQIT) [EP/M013243/1]
  3. Royal Society
  4. John F Templeton Foundation [39530]
  5. Foundational Questions Institute (FQXi)
  6. Imperial CSC scholarship
  7. Leverhulme Trust Research Grant [RPG-2014-055]
  8. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/J014664/1, EP/N031105/1, EP/M013243/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  9. EPSRC [EP/N031105/1, EP/M013243/1, EP/J014664/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We propose an interferometric scheme based on an untrapped nano-object subjected to gravity. The motion of the center of mass (c.m.) of the free object is coupled to its internal spin system magnetically, and a free flight scheme is developed based on coherent spin control. The wave packet of the test object, under a spin-dependent force, may then be delocalized to a macroscopic scale. A gravity induced dynamical phase (accrued solely on the spin state, and measured through a Ramsey scheme) is used to reveal the above spatially delocalized superposition of the spin-nano-object composite system that arises during our scheme. We find a remarkable immunity to the motional noise in the c.m. (initially in a thermal state with moderate cooling), and also a dynamical decoupling nature of the scheme itself. Together they secure a high visibility of the resulting Ramsey fringes. The mass independence of our scheme makes it viable for a nano-object selected from an ensemble with a high mass variability. Given these advantages, a quantum superposition with a 100 nm spatial separation for a massive object of 10(9) amu is achievable experimentally, providing a route to test postulated modifications of quantum theory such as continuous spontaneous localization.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据