4.6 Article

Shuttle inhibition by chemical adsorption of lithium polysulfides in B and N co-doped graphene for Li-S batteries

期刊

PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY CHEMICAL PHYSICS
卷 18, 期 36, 页码 25241-25248

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c6cp04071c

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11304030, 11574040]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of China [DUT16LAB01]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The advance of lithium sulfur batteries is now greatly restricted by the fast capacity fading induced by shuttle effect. Using first-principles calculations, various vacancies, N doping, and B, N co-doping in graphene sheets have been systematically explored for lithium polysufides entrapped in Li-S batteries. The Li center dot center dot center dot S, Li center dot center dot center dot C, Li center dot center dot center dot N and S center dot center dot center dot B bonds and Hirshfeld charges in the Li2S6 adsorbed defective graphene systems have been analyzed to understand the intrinsic mechanism of retaining lithium polysulfides in these systems. Total and local densities of states analyses elucidate the strongest adsorption sites among the N and B-N co-doped graphene systems. The overall electrochemical performance of Li-S batteries varies with the types of defects in graphene. Among the defective graphene systems, only the reconstructed pyrrole-like vacancy is effective for retaining lithium polysulfides. N doping induces a strong Li...N interaction in the defective graphene systems, in which the pyrrolic N rather than the pyridinic N plays a dominant role in trapping of lithium polysulfides. The shuttle effect can be further depressed via pyrrolic B, N co-doped defective graphene materials, especially the G-B-N-hex system with extremely strong adsorption of lithium polysulfides (4-5 eV), and simultaneous contribution from the strong Li center dot center dot center dot N and S center dot center dot center dot B interactions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据