4.6 Article

Stability of solution-processed MAPbI3 and FAPbI3 layers

期刊

PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY CHEMICAL PHYSICS
卷 18, 期 19, 页码 13413-13422

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c6cp00721j

关键词

-

资金

  1. CNR Italian project EFOR-CABIR [CUP B51J10001290001]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [26289265] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We provide a semi-empirical model based on in situ degradation measurements to predict the durability of hybrid perovskite materials under simulated thermal operation conditions. In the model, the degradation path of MAPbI(3) layers is proved to follow an Arrhenius-type law. The predictive role is played by the activation energy combined with its pre-exponential factor. Our comparative study under moisture conditions with respect to vacuum and nitrogen treatments has assessed the occurrence of an intrinsic dynamic exchange of protons between the organic cations and the inorganic cage with a direct impact on the lattice stability, for which the presence of water molecules is not mandatory. This mutual interaction produces defects inside the material and volatile species, such as HI, CH3NH2 or MAI, with an associated experimental activation energy of 1.54 eV measured under vacuum conditions in dark. This value is comparable to that calculated by the density functional theory for defect generation in MAPbI(3). In air, the action of water molecules reduces the activation energy for proton exchanges in dark to 0.96 eV. As an alternative solution to increase the material stability, we demonstrate that the substitution of methylammonium (MA(+)) with the formamidinium (FA(+)) cations inside the inorganic cage gives greater robustness to the overall lattice and extends the material durability due to a different interaction between the organic molecules and the inorganic cage. This definitely supports the use of FAPbI(3) in applications, provided its structure can be stabilized in the dark phase at room temperature.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据