4.6 Article

Time-dependent density functional theory beyond Kohn-Sham Slater determinants

期刊

PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY CHEMICAL PHYSICS
卷 18, 期 31, 页码 20976-20985

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c6cp00722h

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [CHE-1152784]
  2. Department of Energy, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Division of Chemical Sciences, Geosciences and Biosciences [DE-SC0008623]
  3. FWF (Austrian Science Fund) [P 25739-N27]
  4. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [P 25739] Funding Source: researchfish
  5. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) [DE-SC0008623] Funding Source: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

When running time-dependent density functional theory (TDDFT) calculations for real-time simulations of non-equilibrium dynamics, the user has a choice of initial Kohn-Sham state, and typically a Slater determinant is used. We explore the impact of this choice on the exchange-correlation potential when the physical system begins in a 50 : 50 superposition of the ground and first-excited state of the system. We investigate the possibility of judiciously choosing a Kohn-Sham initial state that minimizes errors when adiabatic functionals are used. We find that if the Kohn-Sham state is chosen to have a configuration matching the one that dominates the interacting state, this can be achieved for a finite time duration for some but not all such choices. When the Kohn-Sham system does not begin in a Slater determinant, we further argue that the conventional splitting of the exchange-correlation potential into exchange and correlation parts has limited value, and instead propose a decomposition into a single-particle'' contribution that we denote v(xc)(S), and a remainder. The single-particle contribution can be readily computed as an explicit orbital-functional, reduces to exchange in the Slater determinant case, and offers an alternative to the adiabatic approximation as a starting point for TDDFT approximations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据